Sure, there’s a subdued sensation of bounce-back, but it’s not very pronounced. After all, PEBA-based foams only began appearing in 2017, so cushioning inserts like Zoom Air were as responsive as one could get.īut things are different now, so our benchmarks for bouncy ‘responsiveness’ have evolved.Īt best, the Zoom Air bags act as transition-friendly features that make the ride supportive and efficient. If this shoe were reviewed 8 years ago, we would have labelled the Zoom Air bags as ‘responsive’. The Pegasus 39 is easily the most ‘neutral’ version we’ve run in so far. Unlike many of the previous Pegasus models with a compression scoop on the outer midsole, there’s no cushioning bias here – both sides of the midsole are equally cushioned and supportive. Along with a higher level of softness, the balanced sidewall design adds a stronger neutral character. The React foam midsole is softer than the 38, and delivers a higher level of neutral ride comfort.ĭespite the surface-level similarities, the Pegasus 39 isn’t the same as the 34 it’s a refined version with notable improvements. THE NIKE PEGASUS 39 COMPARED TO PEGASUS 38
So is the Pegasus 39 worth upgrading from the 38? That’s a resounding yes. The fit is secure, and clever touches like the spacer mesh lining and lacing loops make the interiors comfortable and secure. These qualities make the Pegasus 39 very close to being the one running shoe to do it all.Įven the sleeved upper is excellent. It’s good for everyday runs, tempo workouts, long-distance runs, treadmill sessions, and full-contact landing. The dual Zoom Air bags inside the React midsole deliver a cushioning quality that feels just right. The Pegasus 39 is a thoughtfully-designed running shoe that is a far cry from the shoddily put-together React Infinity Run 3. The last two versions weren’t bad running shoes, but they lacked the neutral and balanced do-everything character that the Pegasus was supposed to have. Which is a pity, because we had to endure the mediocre Pegasus 37 and 38. It’s like the Pegasus 34 reincarnated, but with contemporary materials and construction. The Pegasus 35 and 36 were also nice, but their firm ride lacked the mass appeal of the 34.Īnd what’s funny is that the Pegasus 39 is very similar to the Pegasus 34. But Nike’s return to form took nearly four years, because the last time the Pegasus was this good was the version 34. The Nike Pegasus 39 is an excellent running shoe, and one of the best in the series. While this isn’t to say that improvements don’t happen – the new cushioning foams are a great example – but a lot of what you wear on your foot is the result of a primitive design process. The absence of a structured data collection process means that the design of a running shoe is based on anecdotal feedback and subjectivity.
Nike air zoom pegasus mens update#
Time permitting, we’ll write a detailed article on why that is, and why brands should ditch the annual update tradition for most of their shoes. We know, that makes no sense at all, but it’s true. A lot has to do with the development lead time that does not allow the market feedback from the current model to be incorporated into the next shoe. On the other hand, the design of an incoming running shoe model is like a roll of a dice. Is the processor quicker? Has the battery life improved? Is the device lighter or stronger? Things of that nature. Unlike consumer products like smartphones, cameras, and cars, the running shoe design doesn’t progress linearly.įor example, the improvements on a new phone or camera can be easily measured by comparing it with the previous model. The Nike Pegasus 39 is excellent, but it took a while to get to this point.
0 kommentar(er)
